↓ Skip to Main Content

Secondary Navigation

Main Navigation

Home
Planet Earth
3 to 2 planet living
2 to 1 planet living
Posts
About
Contact us
Search for:

Tips for safer cycling in town

aenea Posted on October 14, 2022 Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with cycling, psychology

Post navigation

Previous Post is ‹ Climate Week North East, 16-25th March 2018

Recent Posts

Tips for safer cycling in town
Climate Week North East, 16-25th March 2018
Biodegradable coffee cups
Secondary glazing for windows
Confused by different recyling rules?

Find us on Facebook

Sustainability in Practice

1 years ago

Less is more by Prof Jason HickelPreventing climate change while promoting a growth economy with a growing population is incompatible. This is the substance of economic anthropologist Prof. Jason Hickel’s absorbing book. For 300,000 years our ancestors worked with nature, taking only what they required. Items were traded, but this was not a capitalist society. More recently, during the last five centuries, the concept of capital started to feature. Land and businesses were acquired by a section of the community, forcing the rest to labour for this elite. Entrepreneurs could borrow money to speed development of their ideas, but the lenders or “shareholders”, became the first in the queue to be rewarded from the wealth created. Pay them too little, and they would lend to others rather than you. Suppliers of labour were well down the list of beneficiaries from the growing economy. The lower the cost of labour, the quicker wealth could accumulate. Slavery, colonisation, mechanisation, automation, unemployment all kept labour costs low. Growing profit rather than just the payment of labour and some reinvestment costs became the aim. The availability of capital enabled companies to become juggernauts or monsters, which could gobble up other companies, in part to prevent they themselves from being gobbled up in turn. In this process, it is not just labour that is exploited but the planet too. Relentless growth is accompanied by mining, construction, destruction of nature and pollution. As Hickel says, “clean energy might help deal with emissions, but it does nothing to reverse deforestation, overfishing, soil depletion, and mass extinction. A growth-obsessed economy powered by clean energy will still tip us into ecological disaster”. “What is required is “degrowth” – a planned reduction of excess energy and resource use to bring the economy back into balance with the living world in a safe just and equitable way”. With the technology and scientific understanding that we now have, we can move to a degrowth society “while at the same time ending poverty, improving human wellbeing, and ensuring good lives for all”.We liberate people from the toil of unnecessary products, and shorten the working week to maintain full employment, and expand access to key public services like universal healthcare education and housing. To preserve the planet, nine potentially destabilising processes must be kept under control; climate change, biodiversity loss, ocean acidification, land-use change, nitrogen and phosphorous loading, freshwater use, atmospheric aerosol loading, chemical pollution and ozone depletion. A capitalist growth economy always wants to take more; more resources, more labour, more energy, producing “stuff “, we neither realise we want or need. Degrowth transitions our efforts into things that we do need, a cooler climate, more biodiversity, healthcare, social equality, and less disparity in income. Truly, “Less is More”. Less is more by Prof Jason HickelPreventing climate change while promoting a growth economy with a growing population is incompatible. This is the substance of economic anthropologist Prof. Jason Hickel’s absorbing book. For 300,000 years our ancestors worked with nature, taking only what they required. Items were traded, but this was not a capitalist society. More recently, during the last five centuries, the concept of capital started to feature. Land and businesses were acquired by a section of the community, forcing the rest to labour for this elite. Entrepreneurs could borrow money to speed development of their ideas, but the lenders or “shareholders”, became the first in the queue to be rewarded from the wealth created. Pay them too little, and they would lend to others rather than you. Suppliers of labour were well down the list of beneficiaries from the growing economy. The lower the cost of labour, the quicker wealth could accumulate. Slavery, colonisation, mechanisation, automation, unemployment all kept labour costs low. Growing profit rather than just the payment of labour and some reinvestment costs became the aim. The availability of capital enabled companies to become juggernauts or monsters, which could gobble up other companies, in part to prevent they themselves from being gobbled up in turn. In this process, it is not just labour that is exploited but the planet too. Relentless growth is accompanied by mining, construction, destruction of nature and pollution. As Hickel says, “clean energy might help deal with emissions, but it does nothing to reverse deforestation, overfishing, soil depletion, and mass extinction. A growth-obsessed economy powered by clean energy will still tip us into ecological disaster”. “What is required is “degrowth” – a planned reduction of excess energy and resource use to bring the economy back into balance with the living world in a safe just and equitable way”. With the technology and scientific understanding that we now have, we can move to a degrowth society “while at the same time ending poverty, improving human wellbeing, and ensuring good lives for all”.We liberate people from the toil of unnecessary products, and shorten the working week to maintain full employment, and expand access to key public services like universal healthcare education and housing. To preserve the planet, nine potentially destabilising processes must be kept under control; climate change, biodiversity loss, ocean acidification, land-use change, nitrogen and phosphorous loading, freshwater use, atmospheric aerosol loading, chemical pollution and ozone depletion. A capitalist growth economy always wants to take more; more resources, more labour, more energy, producing “stuff “, we neither realise we want or need. Degrowth transitions our efforts into things that we do need, a cooler climate, more biodiversity, healthcare, social equality, and less disparity in income. Truly, “Less is More”. ... See MoreSee Less

Sustainability in Practice

1 years ago

Sustainability in Practice

1 years ago

Sustainability in Practice

3 years ago

Come to our discussion on insulation, draught-proofing, and zero carbon heating of traditional granite houses, to be held on Tuesday 3rd May, 7-9 pm, via Zoom. Go to Eventbrite, Aberdeen Climate Action events. ... See MoreSee Less

Sustainability in Practice

3 years ago

Clarification required regarding compostable plastics. Oil-based plastic films are not edible by micro-organisms, so when left as litter does not degrade. In contrast plastic plant-based films classified as compostable break down in contact with the soil, in what is a low temperature rotting process. These break down over 6-8 months in my garden composter. Materials classified as biodegradable need to be treated in an industrial composting process, with temperatures rising to 70°C. The result is a compost crumb structure, suitable for spreading on land as a fertiliser. They may or may not decompose at lower temperatures. Oxy, oil-based plastic materials, have a light sensitive chemical in them, which causes the film to break into small fragments of material, which will not subsequently degrade. For compostable or biodegradable films to break down, the microbes need a blended mix of protein, minerals, carbohydrates, air and moisture. Optimally films need to be shredded and mixed with food or garden waste to speed digestion by microbes. As compostable films become the norm for food packaging, more attention will have to be paid to ensure the compost caddy contains a waste mixture that suits micro-organisms’ digestive needs. If plant-based and oil-based films are not clearly differentiated, the default action must be to put the film in the residual waste bin. When we realise that plant-based films are not only plastic substitutes but are in fact food, we can start sending such material to anaerobic digesters to produce biogas to substitute for CO2 producing natural gas. ... See MoreSee Less

Copyright © 2024 Sustainability in Practice | Powered by Responsive Theme